Whether the recent surge in copper prices suddenly make copper terminal companies by surprise? SMM It is understood that the cost of cable companies uplift caused some corporate earnings compressed, and some intermediate processors of copper rod business has therefore been liquidated, even more shocking is that cable companies will then sell the finished product back to the copper plant. But overall, as companies adopted various countermeasures, cable companies have been hit much.
Copper prices rose birth grimace
1, the cable and then sell the finished stripping copper Enterprises:
It SMM understood that, because copper prices pulled up sharply, causing some cable companies produce finished goods inventory increase, leading cable companies will be part of the industry appears finished and then sold to scrap copper wire stripping corporate profits thus obtained more than direct sales of finished .
2, copper rod business is breach of contract rate rise
Due to the recent rally in copper cable companies make terminal under more cost pressure, especially the part of the cable manufacturer's product prices are mostly locked in advance.There are copper rods companies said that cable companies have recently when its breach of contract, an adverse effect on the part of the copper rod business. But it is understood, because the maintenance of long-term credit transactions, default minority enterprises.
3, refined copper scrap spreads widening use ratio rises
In addition, due to the recent copper prices pulled, refined copper spreads widening sharply, according to SMM statistics, November 15 the average price of refined copper spreads up to 3371 yuan / ton, for the January 2011 highs.
Section copper rod manufacturers use raw materials, used in a proportion of copper has increased, partly refined copper rod production companies, said copper rod-making enterprises increased their market share in the near future have a certain impact.
Carbon has a bad name.
But carbon — the element — is not the enemy. Climate change is the result of breakdowns in the carbon cycle caused by us: it is a design failure. Anthropogenic greenhouse gases in the atmosphere make airborne carbon a material in the wrong place, at the wrong dose and for the wrong duration.
Rather than declare war on carbon emissions, we can work with carbon in all its forms. To enable a new relationship with carbon, I propose a new language — living, durable and fugitive — to define ways in which carbon can be used safely, productively and profitably. Aspirational and clear, it signals positive intentions, enjoining us to do more good rather than simply be less bad.
It is easy to lose one’s way in the climate conversation. Few of the terms are clearly defined or understood. Take ‘carbon neutral’. The European Union considers electricity generated by burning wood as carbon neutral — as if it releases no CO2 at all. Their carbon neutrality relies problematically on the growth and replacement of forests that will demand decades to centuries of committed management.
Such terms highlight a confusion about the qualities and value of CO2. In the United States, the gas is classified as a commodity by the Bureau of Land Management, a pollutant by the Environmental Protection Agency and as a financial instrument by the Chicago Climate Exchange.
A new language of carbon recognizes the material and quality of carbon so that we can imagine and implement new ways forward. It identifies three categories of carbon — living, durable and fugitive — and a characteristic of a subset of the three, called working carbon. It also identifies three strategies related to carbon management and climate change — carbon positive, carbon neutral and carbon negative.
Trump to scrap Nasa climate research in crackdown on ‘politicized science’
Nasa’s Earth science division is set to be stripped of funding as the president-elect seeks to shift focus away from home in favor of deep space exploration.
…
Bob Walker, a senior Trump campaign adviser, said there was no need for Nasa to do what he has previously described as “politically correct environmental monitoring”.
“We see Nasa in an exploration role, in deep space research,” Walker told the Guardian. “Earth-centric science is better placed at other agencies where it is their prime mission.
“My guess is that it would be difficult to stop all ongoing Nasa programs but future programs should definitely be placed with other agencies. I believe that climate research is necessary but it has been heavily politicized, which has undermined a lot of the work that researchers have been doing. Mr Trump’s decisions will be based upon solid science, not politicized science.”
TRUMP: HIS OWN WORDS VERBATIM:TRUMP: You know the hottest day ever was in 1890-something, 98. You know, you can make lots of cases for different views. I have a totally open mind.
My uncle was for 35 years a professor at M.I.T. He was a great engineer, scientist. He was a great guy. And he was … a long time ago, he had feelings — this was a long time ago — he had feelings on this subject. It’s a very complex subject. I’m not sure anybody is ever going to really know. I know we have, they say they have science on one side but then they also have those horrible emails that were sent between the scientists. Where was that, in Geneva or wherever five years ago? Terrible. Where they got caught, you know, so you see that and you say, what’s this all about. I absolutely have an open mind. I will tell you this: Clean air is vitally important. Clean water, crystal clean water is vitally important. Safety is vitally important.
And you know, you mentioned a lot of the courses. I have some great, great, very successful golf courses. I’ve received so many environmental awards for the way I’ve done, you know. I’ve done a tremendous amount of work where I’ve received tremendous numbers. Sometimes I’ll say I’m actually an environmentalist and people will smile in some cases and other people that know me understand that’s true. Open mind.
JAMES BENNET, editorial page editor: When you say an open mind, you mean you’re just not sure whether human activity causes climate change? Do you think human activity is or isn’t connected?
TRUMP: I think right now … well, I think there is some connectivity. There is some, something. It depends on how much. It also depends on how much it’s going to cost our companies. You have to understand, our companies are noncompetitive right now.
They’re really largely noncompetitive. About four weeks ago, I started adding a certain little sentence into a lot of my speeches, that we’ve lost 70,000 factories since W. Bush. 70,000. When I first looked at the number, I said: ‘That must be a typo. It can’t be 70, you can’t have 70,000, you wouldn’t think you have 70,000 factories here.’ And it wasn’t a typo, it’s right. We’ve lost 70,000 factories.
We’re not a competitive nation with other nations anymore. We have to make ourselves competitive. We’re not competitive for a lot of reasons.
That’s becoming more and more of the reason. Because a lot of these countries that we do business with, they make deals with our president, or whoever, and then they don’t adhere to the deals, you know that. And it’s much less expensive for their companies to produce products. So I’m going to be studying that very hard, and I think I have a very big voice in it. And I think my voice is listened to, especially by people that don’t believe in it. And we’ll let you know.
French President Francois Hollande on Tuesday urged the United States to respect the "irreversible" Paris Agreement on climate change, and said France will lead a dialogue on the topic with President-elect Donald Trump "on behalf of the 100 countries that have ratified" the deal.
Speaking to a U.N. climate conference in Morocco, Hollande praised U.S. President Barack Obama for his role in getting the landmark pact adopted in the French capital last year.
"The United States, the most powerful economy in the world, the second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases, must respect the commitments that were made," he said. "It's not simply their duty, it's in their interest."
With the blockchain, Wal-Mart will be able to obtain crucial data from a single receipt, including suppliers, details on how and where food was grown and who inspected it. The database extends information from the pallet to the individual package.
“It gives them an ability to have an accounting from origin to completion,” said Marshal Cohen, an analyst at researcher NPD Group Inc. “If there’s an issue with an outbreak of E. coli, this gives them an ability to immediately find where it came from. That’s the difference between days and minutes.”
In the early days of e-commerce, retailers would carry inventory for each product listed on their website. However, in today's model many retailers never physically touch the products they sell online. Instead, online orders for these products are routed to a third party for fulfilment. Both third-party logistics providers and niche e-commerce fulfilment houses offer services in which they will pack and ship items on behalf of retailers.
The world of 3D printing has officially booked a new high fashion runway show, now that luxury fashion house Alexander McQueen has developed an edgy, one-of-a-kind 3D printed umbrella as part of its autumn/winter 2016-17 collection. I am not ashamed to admit that I used to watch a lot of “America’s Next Top Model” and “Project Runway,” and so I was especially excited to write this story…those qualify as high fashion, right?
The limited edition piece is patterned in a black skull motif – too bad it wasn’t out in time for Halloween! It features an ergonomic, 3D printed handle, which perfectly fits the grasp of an actual human fist. Spooky…
But something interesting, and a little unexpected, is happening. FFF machines print using reels of plastic filament (usually PLA or ABS). The choice of materials has been limited because the filaments are typically produced by small-scale companies, serving a low-end market. But we’re now seeing large materials firms entering the filament market, and this can’t be explained by a sudden, unexpected growth in the number of people who want to print novelty plastic Eiffel Tower models at home.
One of the stars of the show of K 2013 was Arburg’s Freeformer. The Germany-based injection moulding machine maker surprised many with a machine that made rapid prototypes using fused droplets of extruded polymer to build up a 3D shape, in a process akin to FFF but without the need for filament.
A selling point of the Freeformer was the freedom to use materials that weren’t available in filament form because it created a melt stream from ordinary granules.
Material choice has limited FFF in the past. According to Covestro, one of the large material firms which entered the 3D printing filament market, whilst ‘‘over 3,000 materials are available for conventional component manufacturing, only about 30 are available for 3D printing’’.
And the process has suffered by association with the ‘homebrew’ hobbyists. Proper, professional, 3D printers used proper, professional 3D printing processes such as stereolithography (SLA) and selective laser sintering (SLS), with high resolution results. FFF has a tendency to create visible stripes, indicating the individual layers of print that have built up on top of one another, leading to a perception of it being a lower-quality technique.
Three years on, FFF is now being treated as a proper, professional process by proper, professional companies and the problem of limited material choice is being blown away. Covestro demonstrated new materials for 3D printing at K 2016. This portfolio of new materials included TPU powders for SLS and liquid PU-based resins for SLA, but also filaments for FFF from flexible TPUs to high strength PC.
Love them or hate them, industrial robots are here to stay. While there are plenty of critics who are against the modern advancement and widespread adoption of robotic technology, these devices can be of great benefit to employees, business owners, and even mainstream consumers. In fact, robotics has already found its way into the day-to-day operations of several different industries.
Here is a look at four of them:
Generally speaking, manufacturing operations provide the perfect environment for the large-scale implementation of robots and automation technology. In fact, the International Federation of Robotics has forecasted the introduction of no less than 1.3 million industrial robots to global manufacturers by 2018. This is in addition to the robotics already in use around the world.
It won’t be long before the cities of the world begin to look very differently than we know them now. 3D printed houses and other buildings have gone from a distant fantasy to a reality seemingly overnight, and 3D printed construction technology is advancing at an almost dizzying pace. New companies – and new technologies – are springing up everywhere, each with the goal of taking 3D printed architecture and construction further than anyone ever has before.
Cazza Construction Technologies may be a young company, but they’re already making significant progress towards an ambitious goal – the construction of 3D printed smart cities across the world. It may sound like a far-fetched goal, but Cazza has the the technology and expertise to back it up. CEO Chris Kelsey is only 19 years old, but has already built and sold a major tech company. He created the app development company Appsitude, which brought in over $10 million in revenue per year, when he was only 17.
Along with co-founder and COO Fernando De Los Rios, a former Ernst & Young employee, Kelsey started Cazza with the goal of making construction faster, more cost-effective, and more environmentally friendly. Over the last two years, he and De Los Rios have been working with more than 50 renowned engineers from across the globe to develop the technology, which is capable of building a 100-square-meter concrete house within 24 hours, or a 1,000-square-foot house within 10 days, using only one machine.
Trump:However, the study, performed by CE Delft, a group of consultants in the Netherlands, concluded that the global refining industry will be able to meet increased demand for middle distillates in the marine sector. With its decision, the IMO has now eliminated the uncertainty with respect to the timing of the implementation of the new sulphur regulations. However, question marks remain on the actual impact on the oil and tanker markets.
Shipowners have two fundamental options on how to deal with the new emissions cap: (1) Burning low sulphur fuel (maximum 0.5% sulphur) or (2) installing Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems (often called scrubbers), which will allow vessels to continue using high sulphur fuel oil. Existing engines can typically burn low sulphur fuel oil, either lighter gas oil or low sulphur heavy fuel oil, without significant modifications. The use of LNG is also an option but, since using this fuel will require significant modifications to existing vessels, including the installation of separate fuel tanks, LNG is only a viable option for newbuilding tonnage. At the moment, the lack of availability of LNG bunkering facilities worldwide is also a limiting factor, especially for ships involved in tramp shipping such as tankers.
The sulphur cap creates an interesting dilemma for both ship owners and refiners. Shipowners have to decide whether to install scrubbers at an estimated cost of $3m to $6m, depending on the vessel size and design, or to burn higher cost low sulphur fuel. The payback period for a scrubber investment will be relatively short if the price differential between high sulphur and low sulphur fuel remains high or increases. The spread will be high if there is limited demand for heavy fuel oil (HFO), which happens if not many owners install scrubbers and/or refiners do not convert significant volumes of residual fuel oil into lower sulphur products.
For refiners, a similar dynamic applies; they have to decide whether to modify their facilities to reduce residual fuel oil output, as the value of this commodity will drop when demand declines. Less sophisticated refineries could reduce the sulphur content in their output by increasing the use of low sulphur crude grades, but such crudes will likely increase in price.
Currently, global residual fuel demand is about 7.3m barrels per day (Mb/d). The IEA estimated that, in 2014, marine bunker demand accounted for 43% (~3.3 Mb/d) of global residual fuel oil demand. In their market outlook published earlier this year, IEA forecasts that in 2020, about 2 Mb/d of marine HFO demand will convert to MGO.