I was not old enough during the dot-com bubble to experience it in any extent. It must have been something. The scope of it. The market correctly foresaw a leviathan. But it didn’t understand exactly its form. And in its uncertainty and excitement, it went mad.
I’ve read a little about the time, read the archives of GettingIt.com, a grotesquely unprofitable valley-focused webzine published at the height of the bubble, whose offices, on bankruptcy, were inhabited by their former (and then-newly-homeless) editor-in-chief for over six months until finally he was kicked out. Legend has it, he spent most of those months inhaling vast quantities of nitrous oxide, leaving a comically large pile of empty whipit canisters for the landlord to clean up.
The CAPE was at an all-time high of 44, never matched before or since. There were parties every weekend, the launch of each new startup or IPO trigging inconceivable celebrations with open bars, all at the investors’ expense. It was the age of pingpong tables, of ice-cream delivery startups, of eyeballs over dollars and IPO, IPO, IPO! It was a golden time for nerds, and a platinum time for fakers, scammers and wanna-bes.
A hell of party and a hell of a hangover — the granddaddy of all bubbles. Quite an experience to live through I imagine, but one I could never quite understand.
Most of those startups seemed so obviously to be terrible ideas. Why were people buying them? I wasn’t old enough to comprehend this question during the dot-com bubble, but I’m living through the ICO bubble now. And for the first time since I read the archives of Gettingit.com in bemused horror, I finally feel like I’ve had a taste of what its like.
Sure, the ICO bubble is much smaller, but for all that its madness is keener, more concentrated. And the terrible ideas would make petfood.com blush.
What is an ICO? It is not a security, at least not one that resembles any security that existed more than 5 years ago. I suppose you could call them commodities that are purchased overwhelmingly for speculative reasons. But I am getting ahead of myself. First, what is Ethereum?
Ethereum is a blockchain protocol very similar to Bitcoin, but unlike Bitcoin it supports sophisticated forms of transactions known as smart contracts. These are simple programs that define when, how, and in what manner ETH (the name of the native token on the Ethereum network) is distributed. Most importantly for this article, this flexibility allows one to create new tokens on top of the Ethereum platform very easily. And it is these tokens or “coins” that are being speculated on in this bubble, “ICO” being an acronym for initial coin offering.
These coins are sold as vital parts of as-yet-undeployed decentralized mechanisms (in the economics sense, as in “mechanism design”) which are purported to be useful at some point in the future, and their tokens are claimed to extract rent or value from the people who will use these services. As we will see, most of these projects are unlikely to be useful. And of those that have a chance of being useful, most don’t seem to clearly need the tokens that were sold and don’t have a clear path to provide value to the token holders, or are likely to be quickly forked into less rent-seeking forms.
That is, unlike in the IPO bubble, for the most part token holders do not own any direct claim or share in the profits of these mechanisms. It is as if during the dot-com bubble people were not speculating on shares of useless companies but instead speculating on limited-supply coupons that could be redeemed to purchase the services of these companies on some indefinite future date.
I cannot help but think this will end in tears.
Tesla Model S – this is the only way you’ll keep warm in one during winter.
From NyTeknik:
Huge hopes tied to electric cars as the solution to automotive climate problem. But the electric car batteries are eco-villains in the production. Several tons of carbon dioxide has been placed, even before the batteries leave the factory.
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute was commissioned by the Swedish Transport Administration and the Swedish Energy Agency investigated litiumjonbatteriers climate impact from a life cycle perspective. There are batteries designed for electric vehicles included in the study. The two authors Lisbeth Dahllöf and Mia Romare has done a meta-study that is reviewed and compiled existing studies.
The report shows that the battery manufacturing leads to high emissions. For every kilowatt hour of storage capacity in the battery generated emissions of 150 to 200 kilos of carbon dioxide already in the factory. The researchers did not study individual bilmärkens batteries, how these produced or the electricity mix they use. But if we understand the great importance of play battery take an example: Two common electric cars on the market, the Nissan Leaf and the Tesla Model S, the batteries about 30 kWh and 100 kWh.
Even when buying the car has thus emissions occurred, corresponding to approximately 5.3 tons and 17.5 tons, the batteries of these sizes. The numbers can be difficult to relate to. As a comparison, a trip for one person round trip from Stockholm to New York by air causes the release of more than 600 kilograms of carbon dioxide, according to the UN organization ICAO calculation.
Another conclusion of the study is that about half the emissions arising from the production of raw materials and half the production of the battery factory. The mining accounts for only a small proportion of between 10-20 percent.
Read more: “The potential electric car the main advantage”
The calculation is based on the assumption that the electricity mix used in the battery factory consists of more than half of the fossil fuels. In Sweden, the power production is mainly of fossil-nuclear and hydropower why lower emissions had been achieved.
The study also concluded that emissions grow almost linearly with the size of the battery, even if it is pinched by the data in that field. It means that a battery of the Tesla-size contributes more than three times as much emissions as the Nissan Leaf size. It is a result that surprised Mia Romare.